5 key elements your technical documentation should include—to improve engineering outcomes
- kommit

- Oct 23
- 3 min read
You've probably seen it happen.
A new teammate joins the project and can't get their environment running. A bug shows up in production, and no one remembers why that edge case was handled that way. Someone needs to update a feature, but the original decision-making lives in someone's head—or in a forgotten Slack thread.
This wasn't a technical failure. It was a documentation failure.
The fix itself? A few hours. The rework from misaligned teams? Weeks. The opportunity cost of delayed features and lost focus? Even higher.
This scenario plays out constantly—different details, same underlying issue.
Good documentation doesn't just help you find information faster. It reduces rework, prevents incidents, captures decisions, and supports long-term system health.
Teams that treat documentation as part of their infrastructure—not an afterthought—build more sustainable systems and scale with fewer setbacks.

The 5 Practices That Drive Results
1. Audience-First Documentation
What it means: Not everyone needs the same information. Developers need architecture. Stakeholders need business context. Ops needs procedures.
Why it works:
Features get adopted faster
Senior engineers get fewer interruptions
Better decisions happen with less back-and-forth
One-size-fits-all documentation helps no one. Write with the reader in mind.
2. Shift-Left Documentation
What it means: Document during planning—not after deployment. Capture decisions when they're made, not months later when context is gone.
Why it works:
Design issues surface earlier (and cost less to fix)
Teams align before code is written
Creates an audit trail of why things were done
Writing things down often reveals gaps before they become incidents.

3. Dedicated knowledge management
What it means:
Assigning a clear owner to documentation—someone who connects inputs, keeps structure, and ensures quality.
Why it works:
Reduces inconsistency and duplicated content
Frees engineers to focus on delivery
Keeps documentation relevant and usable over time
Docs improve when someone is responsible—not just for writing, but for making sure they work.
4. Single Source of Truth
What it means:
Consolidating all relevant documentation in a single, centralized, and accessible repository or platform.
Why it works:
Teams find answers in minutes, not hours
Everyone operates from the same version of the truth
Makes audits, compliance, and reviews simpler
Before SSOT:
Docs scattered across emails, Slack, old wikis, random folders
Confusion, version conflicts, repeated mistakes
After SSOT:
Searchable, accessible, up to date
Decisions could be taken more informed and faster by having access to reliable data
5. Documentation that builds with your product
What it means:
Docs live in version control, right next to your code. They get reviewed, tested, and deployed through the same pipelines.
Why it works:
Always stays in sync with your product
Reduces risk from outdated or forgotten docs
Updates ship in hours, not weeks
When documentation is part of how you build—not something added at the end—it changes the way teams operate.
The Real Impact of Strategic Documentation
So what happens when you put these practices into action?
These five practices don't just make documentation easier to maintain—they redefine how teams think about it.
Strategic documentation isn't about writing more—it's about wasting less. Less time, less rework, less context lost between people, teams, or tools.
Here’s what you gain when documentation works:
Fewer delays and retraced steps – Teams move forward without chasing context
Faster onboarding – New contributors get up to speed without draining others
Reduced support burden – Fewer repeated questions, more time for meaningful work
Stronger handoffs – Projects stay on track across roles and changes
Smarter decisions – Everyone works from the same, accurate source of truth
Documentation as a Strategic Investment
The teams moving fastest aren't skipping documentation—they're doing it strategically.
They document what matters, when it matters, and make that information accessible, accurate, and ready to act on.
Because documentation isn't overhead—it's infrastructure for clarity, collaboration, and smarter decisions.
The real question isn't whether you can afford to invest in better documentation practices. It's whether you can afford the cost of not doing it.
Ready to implement these practices in your team?
At kommit, we help engineering teams turn documentation into an active part of their delivery process. Let's explore how better documentation can drive clarity, speed, and stronger systems for your team.
Written by: kommit
Smith, Jon & Jones, Sara. "Title of the Article." Editorial/Website/Company, 02 July 2024.





Comments